CloserLook > John > John 2:12-25 and 3:1-13 |
Listen
to audio |
<< Back to Closer Look Index | |||
|
Proverbs 20:1 “Wine
is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not
wise.”
Last week, we witnessed Jesus’ first miracle at a wedding in Cana of Galilee. And I like all of His miracles. This one testified to the fact that He was
the Son of God, and
But more specifically, this one "---- manifested forth his glory; and his
disciples believed on him."
However, and again like all of His other miracles, this one met a need. In this case, Jesus intervened on behalf of a young bridegroom, who would have faced embarrassment or even social disgrace. Certainly, Jesus had stepped in to supply his need. But He did much more than that. Like His Heavenly Father "Who daily loadeth us with benefits,” Jesus’ provision could be only
described as exceedingly abundant.
And we also should expect great things from our God, for He "is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think.” ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ However, the question naturally arises, Was this intoxicating wine? And the answer is a decided no. Jesus would have never provided that kind of wine, and considering the verse that we read at the beginning of this lesson, neither would the bridegroom. First of all, let's consider the effects of this beverage that the bridegroom had supplied. In spite of the fact that it had not been sufficient, it definitely wasn't skimpy. It was simply a case of the wine running out before his ample food supply had been consumed. In fact, by the time that Jesus stepped in to save this young man's reputation, his guests had already consumed a great deal of wine, as the ruler of the feast freely admitted. And no doubt the ruler had consumed his fair share of the bridegroom's supply also. So, keeping all this in mind, let's consider his words and demeanour. John 2:9 "Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have
well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until
now."
His words were orderly, very complimentary, and well thought out, and they were delivered to guests who were quite capable of appreciating what he had said. Surely, at this point in the feast, if there had been any question of alcoholic content, there would have been evident signs of intoxication. No, this wasn't a drunken assembly, or anything like it. Everything was being done decently and in order. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ So what about the water that had been turned into wine? What kind of wine had Jesus provided, in order to save this young man's reputation? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Well, we began this lesson by quoting Prov. 20:1 "Wine is a mocker, strong drink is
raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise."
And again in Eph. 5:18, the Apostle Paul commands Christians to "--- be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit.” Would the Son of God have had any part in creating a wine that violated the strict dictates of the Word of God? Obviously, He would not! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Before we leave this wedding, there's another question we should consider. Why did Jesus use the available water, and for that matter the waterpots, to perform this miracle? Certainly, as the Son of God, the Creator of all things, He could have simply spoken the word and created the wine from nothing. And along that same line of thinking, why would Jesus use a little boy’s lunch to feed thousands? Or for that matter, why does He take weak men and women, like you and me, and command them to "Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature --.” As the hymn writer has suggested, He could have proclaimed His message from sky to sky. I don't really know; but that's the way He works, and it is our privilege to work with Him. Yes, Jesus delights to take the ordinary and accomplish a miracle! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ So the wedding was over, and they had gotten on their way. John 2:12-13 "After this he went down to
In contrast to Cana,
This time it would be a short visit because Jesus must
arrive at
However, He would be back. In fact, it would be
And there was a good reason for that.
But for now, He must hurry on. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Jesus would attend four Passovers during His public ministry, and as we will soon see, this one was very important. However, did you notice that V 13 calls this celebration the "Jews' Passover?” Shouldn't it have been God's Passover? On that special night long ago, God had protected their firstborn from the Death Angel by putting them under the blood of the lamb. And as we all know, there was much more to it than that. The Passover lamb looked forward to a very special time, which, by now, was only about three years away. Yes, this feast was very significant, even though it had
degenerated into a religious observance called, the "Jews' passover.”
However, it was still in force, and as a good Jew, Jesus continued to observe it as He had done every year since He was 12 years old. And He would continue to do so until He became its fulfillment. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V 13-14 "And
the Jews' passover was at
hand, and Jesus went up to
It had been 400 long years since God had spoken to
Let's look at His final revelation. Mal. 3:1 "Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me:---" And after 400 years of silence, John the Baptist had
arrived to prepare
The people had been obedient, but their religious leaders had not. They had not repented of their sins, nor had they been baptized. But there's more to Malachi 3:1, so let's read on. "--- and the
Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of
the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the LORD of hosts."
On that very day when Jesus entered the holy city, that prophecy was fulfilled. Their Messiah had come, and He found them (like boys with their hands in the cookie jar), profaning the house of God. Yes, Jesus found "in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers
of money sitting:"
And what does the next verse say He would do about it? Malachi 3:2-3 "But who may abide the day of his coming? and who
shall stand when he appeareth? for he is like a
refiner's fire, and like fullers' soap: Yes, as a refiner, He skimmed off the slag, cleansing His Father's house. John 2:15-16 "And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of
the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money,
and overthrew the tables; Yes, He had come at Passover, and purged out the old leaven of sin from His Father's house. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ But what was it that provoked this reaction? No doubt the animals were being sold to those who had traveled long distances, and would have found it difficult to bring their sacrifices with them. Also, the doves, according to Leviticus 5:7, were the appropriate sacrifice for the poor. And the moneychangers were also necessary to exchange different currencies into the one that was proper for the temple offering. So what was the problem? Well, properly carried out, and in some other place, everything would have been fine, but not in the temple. No, none of these activities should have taken place in God's house. So that's why Jesus said, "Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Then why was this business being carried on in the temple? I think the answer is quite obvious. There was money to be made, and not only by the vendors. No doubt the chief priests had willingly rented these spaces to them. After all, they could hardly have set up shop without their permission. And perhaps the chief priests were even charging them a fee to inspect their animals. Oh yes, these religious leaders were guilty, and I don't think the vendors were completely innocent either. In fact, the second time that Jesus cleansed the temple, for He did it both at the beginning and the end of His ministry, He called them "a den of thieves." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I'm quite sure Jesus’ disciples would have been shocked when He swung into action. After all, John had described Him as the "Lamb of God," not "the Lion of the tribe of Juda.”
However, it wasn't long before the light dawned. V 17 "And
his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal
of thine house hath eaten me up."
Isn't it amazing that these simple fishermen knew Scripture so well? They considered these unusual circumstances, and immediately connected them to David's words in Psalm 69:9 "For the zeal of thine house hath eaten me up; and the reproaches of them that reproached thee are fallen upon me." However, His zeal wasn't an uncontrolled fit of anger. No, it was a slow and deliberate expression of righteous
anger.
Seeing what He must do, He carefully made a scourge to assist Him in getting the job done. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V 18 "Then
answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these
things?"
Don’t you find it interesting that the Jews never defended their activities? No, they knew they were wrong. Instead, they asked Him for a sign to back up His authority. His response was most unusual. V 19 "Jesus
answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will
raise it up."
Contrary to what they were expecting, Jesus didn't perform a miracle, although He certainly could have. Instead, He gave them the sign of His death and resurrection. Yes, His resurrection would prove, once and for all, that not only did He have authority to cleanse the temple, but He had absolute authority. As He would tell His disciples --- "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. But the Jews would never understand that sign. In fact, they would misquote it at His trial. Matthew 26:60-61 "At
the last came two false witnesses, No, they would never understand Him, or even wish to understand Him. They were the defilers of the first temple, and they would
make every effort to be the destroyers of the
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I'm sure His own disciples didn't understand Him either, but they would later on. In fact, V 22 says "When therefore he was risen from the dead, his
disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the
scripture, and the word which Jesus had said."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V 23 "Now when he was in
Now that's
encouraging!
Jesus had
only recently arrived, and already there were many who believed in His name.
And since
that was the real purpose of His miracles, you would have thought Jesus would
have been quite encouraged.
But He
didn't see it that way.
Notice V 24-25 "But Jesus did not commit himself
unto them, because he knew all men, It says they
believed, and they probably looked like they believed, but not to Jesus.
The problem
was, He could see their hearts, and He didn't like what He saw.
No doubt
many of them were only interested in a Messiah who could overthrow the Roman
government, and as He said later, His "kingdom" was "not
of this world.”
Still others
would have been like the seed that was sown on stony ground.
They were
all for Him now, but would quickly forsake Him when the cost became too great.
And maybe
there were other things, but the fact is, "Jesus
did not commit himself unto them.”
In fact,
most of Jesus’ time would be spent in
And as it
turned out, He would have more disciples that He could trust among the
Galileans than He would ever have in
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Fulfilling Malachi’s
prophecy, He had come "suddenly" -- "to his temple",
and He found defilement, treachery, and weakness.
Well, that
was kind of a sad note to end this chapter on, wasn't it, but it was not all
doom and gloom.
In spite of
all the opposition and shallow belief, there were some in that city that were
beginning to see the light, and surprisingly, one of them was a Pharisee.
John 3: 1-2 "There was a man of the Pharisees,
named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews: We are told
in the book of Corinthians, "that
not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called,”
but here was a man who was both wise and well versed in the Scriptures, and he
was very impressed with Jesus.
Yes, he was "a ruler of the Jews,” a member
of the Sanhedrin, and even a scholar himself, but just like those two humble disciples
he was quite willing to call Jesus "Rabbi,”
or teacher.
But why did
he come at night?
John’s two
disciples had visited this Teacher at 10:00 in the morning.
Well, I'm
sure Jesus’ recent activities in the temple hadn’t won him a lot of friends
among the Pharisees, and Nicodemus was one of them.
So he was being
cautious, and wanted to question Jesus privately before making any open
commitment.
And to give
him credit, the day would come when he would stand up and be counted, even
among his colleagues --- as we find in John 7:50-51 "Nicodemus saith unto them, (he that
came to Jesus by night, being one of them,) And not
only that, but he willingly helped Joseph to prepare Jesus’ body for the
tomb, and even provided the spices.
John 19:39 "And there came also Nicodemus, which
at the first came to Jesus by night, and brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes,
about an hundred pound weight."
But for now
he was being cautious.
There is
also the distinct possibility that he had chosen the evening hours when Jesus
would be more available.
I'm sure
you realized that, during the day, Jesus would be completely taken up with the large
crowds that had gathered for Passover.
At night,
there would be a much better chance of getting His undivided attention.
And I think
he got a little more undivided attention than he was comfortable with.
V 3 "Jesus answered and said unto him,
Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the
kingdom of God."
Nicodemus
had never heard anything like this before.
The whole
idea was completely foreign to His religious training.
Mustn't we gradually
improve ourselves, in order to attain the "
Don't we
have to do something, pass some sort of test, in order to gain heaven?
No,
Nicodemus, "Ye must be born again."
It's a new
life that's required.
Not a
renovation of the old life, but something entirely new.
Of course Nicodemus
never said as much out loud, but Jesus knew what he was thinking.
But he did
say this, in V 4 "--- How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be
born?"
No, it
didn't make any sense to him.
He couldn't
start life all over again He was an old man.
And besides
that, his first birth wasn't really that bad.
He was a
Jew, a member of God's chosen people, and a Pharisee.
But Jesus
wasn't talking about a physical birth.
V 5 "Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I
say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of
the Spirit, he cannot enter into the
No, He
wasn't talking about a physical birth. He was describing a spiritual birth.
And He wasn't
talking about a way to heaven; He was talking about the only way to heaven.
But
Nicodemus still wasn't getting it, so Jesus explained further.
V 6-8 "That which is born of the flesh is
flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Did you
notice the example that Jesus used?
It was an
excellent one, wasn't it?
We can't
see the wind, but we all know it's there.
It can pull
trees out by their roots, and drive great ships around the world.
So, in
spite of the fact that we can't see it, it is very real, and it is very
powerful --- "so is every one that
is born of the Spirit."
V 9 "Nicodemus answered and said unto
him, How can these things be?"
At this
point, Jesus couldn't help chastening him just a little.
V 10 "Jesus answered and said unto him,
Art thou a master of
No, he
didn't know "these things,” and he
didn't know who he was talking to either.
Oh, he knew
he was "a teacher come from God,” but
he had no idea that He was actually God in the flesh.
So, gradually,
Jesus began to open his eyes.
V 11-13 "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify that we have seen; and
ye receive not our witness. -----
"he that came down from heaven.”
I'm sure
Nicodemus didn't get it, at least not right away, but we know what Jesus was
talking about, don't we?
If we are
saved, we will definitely be going to heaven, but we didn't come from there.
No, we
weren't little angels or anything else before we were born.
Just like
Adam, we were created right down here on this earth.
But Jesus
didn't start out His life in a little manger in
No, He is
God, and as such, He "came down
from heaven.”
So
Nicodemus would have been well advised to believe Him, and so would we.
Jesus "came down from heaven,” and He
knows what He is talking about.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And not
only did He come from heaven, but He continued to maintain a presence there.
Did you notice
Jesus’ last words in V 13? "And no
man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son
of man which is in heaven."
Now how
could Jesus be in heaven at the same time that He was there talking to
Nicodemus?
Well, only if
He was omni-present, which by the way, is one of God's attributes.
Of course
this brings up a lot of questions that I am not qualified to answer, but the
point is, He is always in contact with His Heavenly Father.
However, there
was one time, and only one time, when Jesus lost contact with heaven.
That was
when He cried out in agony --- "My
God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"
That was
when God "--- made him to be sin for us, who knew no
sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So Nicodemus, you better listen.
Jesus is
God, and Jesus is telling you that -- "Ye must be born again."
And even if
you're a deeply religious person, like Nicodemus was, "Ye must be born again."
Yes, this
is God's official word from heaven --- "Except
a man be born again, he cannot see the
No, there’s no landed immigrants in heaven, just natural born citizens.
|
Home | Bio | Site
Map | Genesis | John | Romans | Ephesian | Hebrews | Misc |
; Phone: 1-226-240-5485