CloserLook > Genesis > Genesis 2:24-25 and 3:1-6 |
Listen
to audio |
|
|||
Download
Audio (Right-Click and select "Save Target As") |
Streaming
Audio (Immediate Playback) |
Genesis 2:24-25 and 3:1-6As
we discovered last week, Eve was a very special person.
For
one thing, unlike the rest of creation, she had been brought into existence
after Adam had been created.
And
while sea life and animals, and even man himself had been formed from the basic
elements of our planet, Eve was created from living matter.
Yes,
she was made from Adam's rib, requiring an operation, and even the involvement
of pain, had not God rendered him unconscious.
And
finally, we were made aware of that special "one flesh" relationship that existed between Adam and
Eve.
Yes,
Eve was very a special creation, not only because she was the perfect "help meet" for her husband, but
because she was a type of the Church of Jesus Christ.
Yes,
Eve was like the Bride of Christ in many ways.
She
was pre-dated by her husband, who is a type of the Eternal One.
And
like the church, her husband was wounded to bring her into existence.
Also,
Eve was part of Adam's body, as is the Church of Jesus Christ.
Ephesians 5:30 "--- we are members of his body, of his flesh,
and of his bones."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
However,
Adam and Eve are not the only couple to foreshadow this blessed relationship.
For
instance, there is Isaac and Rebekah, and several
other couples that are mentioned in scripture.
However,
rather than focussing on these individuals at this particular
time, I would like to continue our study of the marriage relationship itself
that we began in last week’s lesson.
As
you will remember, the Jewish custom of espousal, current in Jesus’ day, effectively
described the Church’s relationship to Christ during the age of grace.
And
just as the espoused bride waited for her bridegroom's arrival, so we should be
expectantly waiting for Christ’s second coming.
For
33 years, Jesus walked the dusty roads of Israel, but this time, His feet will
not even touch the ground.
No,
He will come in the clouds, and His espoused bride will meet Him in the air.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
But
there is more!
Not
only does the espoused Jewish bride describe our relationship to Christ in this
age of grace, but the institution of marriage itself is very instructive when
it comes to describing this heavenly relationship, and vice versa.
Let
me explain.
As
we noted in last week's lesson, God (through Adam) placed the marriage
relationship on a firm foundation. --- " Therefore shall a man leave his father and his
mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."
Yes,
God intended marriage to be permanent, not only because it is the basis on which
our society is built, but because Christian marriage foreshadows the eternal
relationship between Christ and His Church.
And
not only does the permanence of this earthly institution teach us a valuable
lesson concerning eternal security, but this heavenly relationship with Christ
is a stabilizing force in our own marriages.
So
both the type and the antitype are very important, and both are completely
intertwined.
That’s
why Satan has made such an effort to tear down the stability of marriage, and
the stability of our salvation.
Let’s
look at Ephesians 5, where Paul uses the type and the anti-type to explain and
strengthen each other.
Ephesians
5:21-33 "Submitting yourselves one to another in the
fear of God. It
should be evident from this passage that it is not only Adam and Eve that are a
type of Christ and the church, but, actually, every Christian man and woman
inside the bonds of marriage should typify this heavenly relationship by their
conduct.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Because
of our inseparable union with Him and in Him, we are assured of our salvation,
our righteousness, our inheritance, and our home in heaven.
It
is a relationship that can never be broken.
Because
we are God’s dear children, we can expect to be disciplined if we disobey; but
because we are the Bride of Christ, we will never be lost.
No,
there will never be a single member of Christ’s body in hell.
And
as our relationship to Christ is the foundation of our peace, so our earthly marriages
should be an island of peace, and the umbrella under which the children can
safely dwell.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V
23-24 "And Adam said, This is now bone of my
bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken
out of
I’m
sure everyone will agree that V 24 places marriage on a stable foundation, but
was this utterance merely Adam’s opinion on the subject?
Certainly
V 23 tells us that it was Adam that spoke these words.
However,
I still don't believe he was the author of these words.
As
a matter of fact, I believe they were actually God's first revelation to man,
and they emphasized the importance that He placed on the stability of marriage.
No,
Adam could not have been the author of these words, because they involved a
subject he knew nothing about.
After
all, Adam had been created as an adult, never having a father or a mother, and
he had never been a father himself.
No,
he knew absolutely nothing about the
concept of parenting, and yet he said, "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother.”
With
no previous experience to base his statement on, Adam effectively laid down the
basic principle that the marriage relationship should take precedence over the
parental relationship.
And
even though Adam was fully aware of the physical aspects of the statement "and they shall be one flesh," there
is a much deeper meaning to his words
than he could have ever imagined.
Paul
brings this out in Ephesians Chapter 5.
V
31-32 "For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be
joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh." (Essentially he
was quoting Adam's words, and then he makes this additional statement.) "This is a great mystery: but I speak
concerning Christ and the church."
So,
even though Adam was completely unaware of the fact that he and his wife were a
type of Christ and His Church, and that their marriage was a picture of the
church's unending union with Christ, he effectively nailed down the permanency of
marriage on the very day that God brought Eve to him.
Yes,
Adam was God's very first prophet.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Now,
I realize that some marriages end in divorce, and there is nothing that the
unfortunate partner can do about it.
I
have the greatest sympathy for those who have gone through that devastating
experience, and I'm not here to judge them.
However,
the principle still remains--God intended marriage to be permanent.
And
Jesus quoted Adam’s very words (although He attributed them to God)to make this point.
We
see that in Matthew 19:3-6 "The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is
it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? So
there you have it. Marriage was
instituted by God, and He immediately protected it by His inspired word-- "Therefore shall a man leave his
father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Genesis 2:25 "And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed."
Obviously, they didn't need
clothing to protect themselves from the elements.
At
that particular time, the world probably enjoyed a universally temperate
climate.
But what about the moral and psychological
implications?
Apparently
they weren’t a problem either.
And
we will be discussing this subject a little more thoroughly when we get further
on in Genesis Chapter 3, but we must begin at the beginning.
And
here we are at the beginning of this chapter and V 1: "Now the serpent was more subtle than any
beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman,
Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of
the garden?"
So
far we have discovered some unusual things in Genesis:
·
The climate
and watering system were much different than they are today.
·
Man and
animals were vegetarians.
·
And now, to
top it all off, we are about to meet a talking animal--or at least an animal
that talked.
I'm
sure we will all agree that Satan must have been indwelling the serpent, and
that it was he who was controlling the conversation, although the scriptures don't
actually say that, or even mention his name in that connection.
However,
what is obvious from the surrounding context is the fact that this wasn't the
first time that the serpent had spoken to Eve.
Certainly
he was of a higher order, for V 1 clearly tells us he "--- was more subtle than any beast of the
field." But could he actually talk?
Of
course, I wasn’t there, even though I might look that old, but the point is, Eve was, and her reactions are quite
revealing, or should I say, her lack of any reaction whatsoever was quite
revealing.
Apparently
the snake just walked right up to her and said, "Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every
tree of the garden?" And Eve
answered his question without batting an eyelash: "We
may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: If
this was the first time she had
experienced such a thing, I think she would have run the other way shouting, Adam, there's an animal over here that can talk!
But
she didn’t, did she?
No,
she answered his question calmly, like it was an everyday event, because it was an every day event.
And
if the serpent could actually talk, then he would have been the ideal tool for
Satan’s purposes.
Yes,
He could get his message across, and Eve would be none the wiser.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
However,
there is another scenario.
Perhaps
the serpent really wasn't a talking animal.
Perhaps
Satan had been talking to Eve through the serpent for a month or so in order to
precondition her, and by now she really believed serpents could talk.
Certainly
Satan would be smart enough to make such a preparation.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
But
actually, it doesn't really matter whether the serpent could talk or not.
What
does matter is the content of their conversation, because it has affected us all.
So
let's listen in.
If
we stand behind these bushes, no one will ever notice us.
Genesis 3:1 "--- And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of
every tree of the garden?”
Here
is the very first indication that it really was Satan who was controlling the
conversation.
Yes,
the very first words out of the serpent’s mouth questioned the reliability of God’s
Word---"hath God said"?
Did
God actually say that?
Maybe
Adam got it all wrong.
Maybe
there was something lost in the translation.
And
even today, it really doesn't matter who is actually speaking. Whenever the reliability of God's Word is
questioned, you can be pretty sure who is controlling the conversation.
Yes,
that’s step 1 in Satan’s program--- question the Word of God.
And
it’s still step 1 in his program, and
it still works very well:
Did God actually mean it when He
said --- "He that believeth
on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not
see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him"?
Surely a loving God would never say
there is only one way to heaven. That’s just
too narrow.
And besides that, there are so many
contradictions in the Bible.
No, you shouldn't take everything
literally.
For instance, look at the book of Genesis.
You know that part about a flood
covering the whole earth, and a boat that could hold enough animals to repopulate the entire
world.
Yes,
that’s step 1: Question the Word of God.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
But
you have to give Eve credit for one thing.
She
did answer the serpent’s question by quoting the Word of God.
V
2-3 "And the woman said unto the
serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But
she didn’t quote it very well, did she?
Somewhere
along the line, someone added to God’s statement.
Maybe
it was Adam.
After
all, he was the only one who had actually heard God’s commandment.
Or
was it Eve?
We
don't really know, but the fact remains, someone had been careless--or perhaps ever
worse--in their handling of the Word of God.
Here's
what God actually said: "But of the tree of the knowledge of
good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it." And that's all He said, other than spelling out the consequences.
However,
Eve added the words "neither shall ye touch it."
Do
you detect a certain tone of discontent in those words?
They
were Eve's words, or possibly Adam's, and they revealed a rather negative attitude
toward God's commandment.
Isn’t
that the way it is with false cults?
They
add and take away from the Word of God in order to promote their own opinions
and agendas.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So
that was step 1: Question the Word of
God.
And
having found a little chink in Eve's armour, Satan
felt confident enough to take step 2.
V 4 "And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die."
Having
successfully questioned God’s words,
it wasn't long before he blatantly denied it: "Ye
shall not surely die."
When
Eve heard that statement, she should have ran for the
hills!
But
she stayed, and she listened.
And
as she listened, she began to question the motives of her best friend, and that
left her wide open for step 3, the substitution of a lie for the truth.
V
4-5 "And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye
shall not surely die: God
had said, "in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely
die," but Satan said, "in
the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened."
Yes,
he actually quoted God’s words, and then added some of his own.
And
you know what?
That’s
exactly what Eve had done!
Yes,
Satan used enough truth to make his lie convincing, and then he added,"then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be
as gods--."
But
they weren't going to be "as gods."
Oh,
their eyes would be opened all right, but only to show them that "they were naked.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So
let’s re-read V 5---"For God doth
know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye
shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."
Wouldn't
you think this would be a hard sell even for Satan?
After
all, Eve was living in a garden paradise.
She
had an incorruptible body with no possibility of disease or death to worry
about.
She
had a good husband.
And
when the time came for her to have children, she wouldn't experience birth
pains.
Yes,
she had it made.
But
then Satan said, Hey, you haven't seen anything yet. There’s a
bright new world out there, and you’re missing out!
And
you know what? He still uses that same tactic
today.
And
although I might sound a little biased, I think he uses it most effectively on
Christian young people, or at least on young people from Christian homes.
You
see, young people who have been raised by Christian parents are a lot like Eve.
Oh,
I realize Christian homes are not always a paradise, but compared to a lot of worldly
homes, most of them are.
But
Satan begins spreading discontent: You’re
missing out. Get a life, man. There are
a lot of cool things going on out there.
And
there are a lot of exciting things for young people to experience in the world.
Viewed
from a distance, they look pretty good.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And
Satan has something better for adults, too.
A
few years ago, it was THE BRAVE NEW WORLD, and then it was the NEW CONSCIOUSNESS,
and THE NEW AGE MOVEMENT.
But,
actually, none of these things are new.
They’re
the same old lie that Satan told Eve back in the Garden.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So
Eve was in a dilemma.
Who
was she going to believe?
Was
God really her friend, or was the serpent her friend?
It
was kind of like a Pandora’s Box.
There
might be wonderful things inside, but you had to open it to find out.
And
she just couldn’t take a little nibble and spit it out if she started to feel
funny.
No,
she couldn't test the forbidden
fruit.
But,
actually, it wasn't the fruit that needed testing.
It
was her heart that was on trial, and it should have passed the test with flying colours.
God
had given her everything.
Why
would she doubt such a Friend, even for a moment?
Proverbs
4:23 says, "Keep thy heart with all
diligence; for out of it are the issues of life."
But
Eve had already listened to Satan’s lie, and already her heart was contaminated
by suspicion and pride.
And
because of this, she had really narrowed down her options.
If
you start questioning the Word of God, if you begin to doubt His motives, you
only have one thing left: human
reasoning.
Now,
human reasoning is really great when it comes to solving most day-to-day
problems, but it's not worth a fig when it comes to checking out God.
Yes,
Proverbs 3:5 is very good advice: "Trust
in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding."
And
with all the emphasis we place on smarts today, the real issues of life are still
a matter of the heart.
However,
Eve had decided to follow her head rather than her heart.
V
6 "And when the woman saw that the tree was
good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired
to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also
unto her husband with her; and he did eat."
Actually,
it's not too surprising that human reasoning came up with "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the
eyes, and the pride of life," for 1 John 2:16 tells us that's all
there is "in the world."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And
even when he tried to tempt Jesus, Satan could only come up with these same three
categories.
In
Jesus’ case, he started out with the desire of the flesh---"If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made
bread."
What
an appealing suggestion this must have been after a 40-day fast.
"Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of
them."
Here
we have the desire of the eyes, but, of course Jesus wasn't buying it.
Then
he tried "the pride of life."
Cast
thyself down from "a pinnacle of
the temple." The angels will catch you, and you will be immediately
recognized as their Messiah.
In
each case, Jesus countered the Devil's temptations by quoting the Word of God.
And
we should hide God's word in our hearts also against the day when Satan tempts us
in these very same areas.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Well,
Eve had a good look at "the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil," and right away she noticed "that the tree was good for food."
Well,
I should think it would be, after all, God made it.
That
was the appeal to the desire of the flesh.
But what about all the other fruit in the Garden of
Eden? Wasn't it good for food?
Why
do we always convince ourselves that forbidden fruit will taste so much better?
Why
does the baby tip over his pabulum, trying to reach his father's food, which he
is unable to digest?
It’s
just human nature, isn't it?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And
then she took another look, a very wishful look, and she discovered that, "--- it was pleasant to the eyes."
How
could something be bad when it looked so good?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And
she just knew it was "--- a tree to be desired to make one wise."
Now,
how in the world did she ever figure that out?
Actually,
she didn't figure it out.
The
whole idea had been planted in her heart by the power of suggestion.
Remember
Satan’s words--"then your eyes
shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods.”
By
now she thought it was her idea, and
it tickled her pride.
Yes! We can "be as gods."
Does
that sound a little familiar?
"I will ascend above the
heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High."
Ah,
yes, Satan had said those very words, and Eve would be the second one to fall because of pride.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Next
week, we will be looking at another first.
Yes,
Genesis Chapter 3 records the first time that man experienced God's judgment.
At
first, we might be inclined to think that God was a little harsh.
After
all, it was only stealing apples, wasn't it?
Actually,
we don't really know what kind of fruit it was, but that's not the point.
You
see, it wasn't the apple in the tree that was the problem. It was the pair on the ground.
No,
it wasn't a case of stealing apples. It
was nothing less than rank rebellion.
|
Home | Bio | Site
Map | Genesis | John | Romans | Ephesian | Hebrews | Misc |
; Phone: 1-226-240-5485