CloserLook > Genesis > Genesis 2:10-20 |
Listen
to audio |
|
|||
Download
Audio (Right-Click and select "Save Target As") |
Streaming
Audio (Immediate Playback) |
Genesis 2:10-20"And
the LORD God planted a garden
Eastward
in
Last
week we entered that beautiful garden without a moment to look around.
However,
this week I would like to look at the first habitation of man through the eyes
of John Phillips, a Bible commentator I depend upon a great deal.
His
description is quite unique, and I'd like to share it with you:
"When Adam first opened his eyes to the
light of day, he looked out upon a scene of matchless beauty and
tranquility. The fields were emerald
green, the hedgerows ablaze with blossoms, the atmosphere laden with the
fragrance of flowers, the forests ringing with joyous song. Strolling through his vast estate, Adam could
pause to see a wolf playing tag with a lamb, could stop to romp with a jungle
lion or to inhale the perfume of the most perfect rose that ever gladdened the
eyes of man. He could pause to pick a
plum, to prop a burdened vine, to plant a peach tree, to gaze with awe and
wonder at the tree of life - the first tree ever to become extinct upon the
earth. He might wander by way of the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil standing silent, mysterious, alone - the
only tree forbidden to him in all his boundless domains. "Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Last
week, we gleaned some very interesting information about trees.
Genesis
2:9 "And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is
pleasant to the sight, and good for food--."
Primarily,
God made trees for the good of man, as was the case with all of creation.
Among
other things, trees were made for food.
And
since Genesis 1:29-30 makes it clear that both man and animals were vegetarians
at the time, this fruit would form a very necessary and pleasant part of their
diet.
So
the modern-day theory that trees evolved both flowers and fruit for their own
purposes is absolutely incorrect.
We
only need to look around us to realize the fallacy of that theory.
If
the preservation of the species was the only criteria, then a world full of pines
trees would have done the job quite nicely.
But
would they satisfy man's need for beauty? And have you ever tried to eat a pine cone?
What
a hungry, boring world it would be if trees only provided for their own needs!
But
God had other ideas.
He
wanted trees of all shapes and sizes which would be "pleasant to the eye, and good for food." So that’s exactly what He created.
He
created maples with their colorful leaves and sweet sap.
He
created the mighty elm, towering over our heads like a graceful fountain.
He
fashioned fruit trees bearing apples, pears, oranges, plums, and on and
on.
Yes,
He created different shapes and different foods almost without number, trees
that were "pleasant to the sight,
and good for food.”
In
short, God made trees to supply man's need.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V 10-14 "And
a river went out of
The
river that "--went out of Eden to water the garden" must have been mighty, for each tributary was significant in itself.
Its
abundant supply would have greatly assisted the mist that went up from the
earth "and watered the whole face
of the ground.”
Which reminds us of fact that these rivers would not
have been supplied in the conventional manner familiar to us.
Our
present system of irrigation, which lifts great quantities of water from the
ocean by solar power and redistributes it in the form of rain, did not
exist.
However,
it seems quite probable that the rivers of Adam's day, indeed of the whole
Antediluvian age, were amply supplied by Artesian wells.
No
doubt the oceans of the world emptied into underground reservoirs, which, in
turn, were pressurized by subterranean heat to become "the fountains of the great deep" spoken of
in Genesis 7:11.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Some
of the names mentioned here are still with us.
The
mighty Euphrates still flows, and the lands of Ethiopia and Assyria appear on our present-day maps.
And,
apparently, according to descriptions found on ancient Assyrian monuments, the
river Hiddekel was later named the Tigris.
However,
before you spend a lot of money looking for the gold of the land of Havilah, you
should consider the fact that we are talking about Antediluvian geography here.
As
the book of 2 Peter 3:6 tells us, "the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished."
And
as we will learn in future lessons, the flood of Noah’s day totally rearranged
the geography of our earth.
The Pison and the Gihon no
longer exist, and the Hiddekel (or Tigris) flows
along the western border of Assyria, not the eastern side.
So
it is quite evident that these were only Antediluvian names for entirely
different rivers and lands which perished in the flood long ago.
However,
these names would be familiar to Noah's family, and no doubt would have been
applied to new rivers and places to make them feel at home, much as London,
Ontario, was named after London, England.
Apparently,
this has not been taken into consideration by those who believe they can use
the present day Tigris and Euphrates to
identify the geographical location of Eden.
And
wherever Eden was originally, it would have been swept away by the same
universal flood that altered the rest of the world's geography.
Well,
I think that’s enough about rivers.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V
15 "And the LORD God took the man,
and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to
keep it."
It
was never God’s intention that Adam lay around eating fruit all day.
He
gave him a job because Adam needed a
job.
And
he got that job before he sinned, not as a punishment, but because God knew it
was not good to be unemployed.
Yes,
when Adam was a perfect man, God "put
him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So
how did we get the idea that work is a curse, something imposed upon us because
of Adam’s sin?
Let’s
jump ahead to Genesis Chapter 3.
V
17-19 " And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast
hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I
commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it:
cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; There
are two curses mentioned here, and they both involve the ground, not work.
One
of them was corruption.
From
that point on, Adam would begin his long journey to the grave.
We
will be talking more about that later.
But
the one I want to talk about now is weeds.
Of
course they would be a great hindrance to a vegetarian, and would certainly
make his work more difficult.
Not
only would the ground grow what he planted, but it would also grow what he
hadn't planted!
And
because of this opposition, Adam would work "in the sweat of his face."
So,
it wasn't just work anymore, it was hard work,
and it was discouraging work.
And
every time we try to bypass that problem without work, we usually end up
poisoning ourselves.
No,
work wasn't the blessing it had been, but it certainly wasn't a curse.
So,
even though sin affected Adam’s work negatively, as it did everything else, its
original purpose was to be a blessing, not a curse.
It
had been given to a perfect man in a perfect environment to provide him with the
blessing of accomplishment.
Now,
I'm fully aware of the fact that all jobs are not a blessing, and I've had some of them, but neither is
unemployment.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
And
reward without work is not good either.
That’s
a principle any government would do well to recognize, and it's a principle
that God applied in Israel many years ago.
Leviticus
19:9-10 "And when ye reap the harvest of your land,
thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field,
neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy
harvest. The
harvest was gathered by hand in those days, and it would be entirely possible to
reap every inch of a field.
But
God would not allow it.
The
corners of the fields were to remain untouched!
Neither
could they pick up any grain that had been dropped accidentally, nor were they
allowed to go over their vineyards a second time.
By
God's express command, the poor of the land could trespass on private property
during harvest and glean their
rightful share.
It
was God's way of providing for their needs while retaining their integrity and
self respect.
And
again in Deuteronomy 24:19-21, we read "When thou cuttest down thine harvest in thy field, and hast forgot a sheaf in the field, thou shalt not go again to fetch it: it shall be for the
stranger, for the fatherless, and for the widow: that the LORD thy God may
bless thee in all the work of thine hands. By
law, the gleanings belonged to the stranger, the fatherless, and the
widow.
Yes,
people need work, not handouts.
If
they are physically fit, they need to earn their living, and God started applying that principle way back in the Garden of
Eden.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V
16-17 "And the LORD God commanded the man, saying,
Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: Adam
had been given all things to enjoy, while God only reserved one tree for
Himself.
Nevertheless,
for the first time in his very short life, Adam had been given a choice, and it
was a necessary choice.
No,
God hadn't made a mechanical man. He had made a moral man, made "in the image of God.”
Adam
must be given the power of choice, or he would be a mere puppet on a string.
However,
once Adam had been given the right to decide, there was always the possibility
that he might disobey.
So
God made his alternatives very clear.
He
could choose the abundant life, or he could choose death.
Now,
that was fair, wasn't it?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
No
mention is made here of "the tree
of life.”
At
that particular time, there was absolutely no prohibition against the eating of
its fruit.
So
why was that?
Why
was it of no particular concern to God if Adam ate of "the tree of life" when it was of vital
importance later?
It
wasn't an issue then because Adam was in his completely sinless state, and would
have lived for ever.
However,
on that fateful day when he and his wife disobeyed God, everything changed.
Remember
the warning, "--- in the day that
thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die."
After
the curse of death had fallen, "the
tree of life" offered the tempting possibility of bypassing God's
judgment.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
But
what did God really mean when He said -- "in the day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die"?
After
all, Adam didn’t die physically on that
particular day.
Actually,
he lived for a total of 930 years, and considering the fact that he started out
life as an adult, that’s quite an age!
But
we must always remember the fact that man is more than a body and a soul.
Man
has a spirit, and he needs communion with God.
Up
to that time, Adam had enjoyed God's fellowship probably on a daily basis.
However,
on that very day that he ate of the forbidden fruit, he died spiritually, and spiritual
death is separation from God.
He
died spiritually, and he died instantly.
On
that very day, Adam and Eve lost their fellowship with God.
But
there is more than spiritual death involved here, as devastating as that is.
Something
else happened on that awful day.
We
will be talking more about that when we get to Chapter 3.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Genesis 2:18 "And the LORD God said, It is not good that
the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him."
During
those six days of creation, when God had finished a particular phase of His
work, He said "it is good," and upon its full completion, "God
saw everything that He had made, and behold it was very good."
But
now we find Him looking at the perfect man He had made, surrounded by a perfect
environment, and making this surprising statement---"It is not good that the man should be alone."
Adam
was physically perfect.
In
his present condition, his body would have never seen corruption.
He
was spiritually perfect, enjoying sweet communion with God, probably on a daily
basis.
And
yet he was alone!
Yes,
God's perfect creation had a perfect deficiency.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
In
1 Corinthians 7, Paul points out some advantages of being single.
And
certainly there are situations, as in Paul’s case, when an individual can
perform his or her ministry for the Lord more effectively if they are single.
However,
Paul's statement has given rise to the mistaken belief that it is more
spiritual to be single than it is to be married.
Actually,
Paul didn’t say that.
He
only said there are situations when the responsibilities of marriage will limit
a person’s ability to fully accomplish a particular work for God.
For
instance, some missionaries and travelling evangelists have found this to be
true, and they have voluntarily sacrificed marriage for the Lord’s Work.
But
that's not usually the case, and Paul even says that "--every man hath his proper gift of God."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So
here we have a perfect man who needs a
wife.
In
fact, God said, "It is not good
that the man should be alone."
Oh,
really!
Can
a man be alone when he has daily fellowship with God?
Apparently
he can.
He
can, and God says "It is not good."
Even
though Adam knew all the animals on a first-name basis, and even though he had
fellowship with his Creator on a daily basis, God still said he was "alone.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
A
few years ago, I saw a bumper sticker that said: "The more people I meet, the more I love
my dog."
Have
you ever felt like that?
However,
even though V 20 tells us that "-- Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast
of the field," even though any of those creatures could have been his
constant companion, "there was not
found an help meet for him."
They
say a dog is a man’s best friend, and I suppose that’s because he wags his tail
instead of his tongue, but, actually, a man’s best friend is not his dog or his
horse.
No,
man needs a partner, a female partner, that like
himself, is created in the image of God.
That’s
why V 20 tells us, "there was not found an help meet for him."
Animals
could give him affection and loyalty, and they still do, but only another human
being, created in the image of God, could give him the mental and spiritual companionship
he really needed.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So
we have to ask ourselves the question, Do I provide for
the needs of my partner?
Certainly,
we should be a comfort to our spouse, both in body and soul.
However,
in a Christian marriage, there is a deeper fellowship of the spirit which God wants us to share
together.
And
the stated reason that God gave for creating Eve was the fact that--"for Adam there was not found an help meet for him."
Are
we helping our spouse to achieve his or her greatest potential for the Lord?
It’s
a question we need to ask ourselves very often.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V
19-20 "And out of the ground the
LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and
brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam
called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And
I don't think he called them Molly, and Sparky, and Sam either.
No,
he gave them appropriate names that would describe their character, or perhaps
their specific place in creation.
That’s
not bad for a cave man who had just evolved from an ape, is it?
No,
Adam was never a cave man.
He
was a highly developed individual, made in the image of God, from the very moment
of his creation.
However,
it still amazes me that God would entrust Adam with such an important
assignment.
I
would have expected Him to handle that job Himself.
Think
of the intelligence required to name every animal appropriately.
What
a mind Adam must have had, and what confidence God put in him!
No,
man didn't evolve down through the centuries to eventually get as smart as
modern man.
In
fact, modern man would make a very poor showing if he were compared to God's
first perfect creation.
Yes,
Adam was finished on the sixth day of
creation, and no updates were ever necessary!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
As
we have already noted back in Genesis 1:29-30, both man and animals were
vegetarians at the beginning.
When
Adam named the animals, the rabbit wasn't concerned that he might end up as rabbit
stew that night!
Nor
was Adam fearful when he named the tigers, or the black panthers, or the lions.
No,
Adam was living in a world full of big cuddly pets!
It’s
not like that today, is it?
You
just have to look at a nature film to be reminded of the fact that the law of
the wild still prevails.
But
that’s going to change.
Let's
look at Romans 8:20-21.
"For the creature (or the creation) was made subject to vanity, not willingly,
but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, Yes,
Adam, and indeed the whole Antediluvian civilization, once lived in a
vegetarian world full of tame animals.
That
changed after the flood.
Genesis 9:2 "And the fear of you and the dread of you
shall be upon every beast of the earth---."
However,
someday we will come full circle,
did you know
that?
When
Jesus comes back to reign over this earth, the animals will be tame once again!
We
see that foretold in Isaiah 11:6-10 "The
wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the
kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little
child shall lead them. We've
never seen anything like that, have we?
However,
in that day, the law of the wild will be abolished, and every animal will be a vegetarian
once more.
Let's
back up to Isaiah 11:1-5, where the One who is responsible for this great
change is described--"And there
shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of
his roots: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Yes--♫♪
“Jesus shall reign where’er the sun
Doth his
successive journeys run.
His kingdom spread from shore to
shore
Till moon shall wax and wane no
more."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
When
the Second Adam reigns over this earth, there will be no cries in the night.
"They shall not hurt nor destroy in all My holy mountain."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Next
week we will be witnessing the first operation, complete with anaesthetic!
I
hope you can be with us once again.
|
Home | Bio | Site
Map | Genesis | John | Romans | Ephesian | Hebrews | Misc |
; Phone: 1-226-240-5485